Phys 506 lecture 23: 3D scattering continued

Wigner threshold law

Last time, we showed from the delta shell solution that at low energy tanδ(k)(ka)2+1. This is called the Wigner Threshold Law, and it shows that s-wave scattering dominates at low energy. We parametrize low-energy scattering with a scattering length a0 and an effective range r0: k2+1cotδ(k)=1a+12k2r2+O(k4) where a and r are constants.

Now recall, that we found for the delta shell potential: tanδ(k)=λa(ka)2+1[(2+1)!!]2(1λa2+1). Hence: k2+1cotδ(k)=[(2+1)!!]2(1λa2+1)λa which implies: a=λa1λa2+1 and so the scattering length is: a0=λa1λa Note that the scattering length goes through a divergence when λa=1. For higher partial waves (>0), divergences occur when λa=2+1. Hence, the scattering length can become much larger than the range of the potential. This phenomenon leads to resonances, where the system becomes highly sensitive to the interaction strength. These resonances are known as Feshbach resonances and occur when tuned by an external magnetic field and are very important in ultra-cold atomic physics as they can govern the interactions between atoms and allow one to tune different interactions.

Low-Energy Scattering Cross Section

As k0, the scattering cross section σ(k) is given by: σ(k)4πsin2δ0(k)k2 But for small k, δ0(k)λaka1λaa0k. Thus, the low-energy cross section becomes: σ(k0)=4πa02 This demonstrates that the scattering length a0 determines the total cross section for low-energy scattering.

Origin of the scattering resonance

But what is the origin of the scattering resonance? The scattering resonance is related to the bound states of the potential. Therefore, let’s examine the attractive delta shell potential, which has bound states: 22md2dr2fk(r)+2(+1)2mr2fk(r)2λ2mδ(ra)fk(r)=Enfk(r) We already observed in the plane-wave case that the solutions for ra are j(ikr), η(ikr) where k2=2mE2 and these are analytically continued to imaginary argument. We also matched the wave functions at r=a and took into account the discontinuity at r=a f(r)={Aj(ik1r)r<aBj(ik2r)+Cη(ik2r)r>a As r0, the behavior of j(kr) is fine since j(kr)(kr). For large r: {j(kr)1ikrsin(ikrπ2)n(kr)1krcos(ikrπ2) To ensure exponential decay, we need C=iB. Using the complex identities for sine and cosine: {cosx=eix+eix2sinx=eixeix2i we get: i2(cosx+sinx)eix Setting x=ikr gives us the form of the exponential decay we want. Thus: f(r)={Aj(ikr)r<a,B[j(ikr)+iη(ikr)]r>a. At r=a, we impose continuity of f(r), giving us: Aj(ika)=B[j(ika)+iη(ika)]. Rearranging this, we get: A=B(1+iη(ika)j(ika)). For the derivative discontinuity at r=a: Bik[j(ika)+iη(ika)]Aikj(ika)=λAj(ika). Substituting our expression for A found above from continuity, we get: B[j(ika)+iη(ika)]B(1+iη(ika)j(ika))j(ika)=λkB(1+iη(ika)j(ika))j(ika). Simplifying, this gives: ij(ika)η(ika)iη(ika)j(ika)=iλkj(ika)[j(ika)+iη(ika)]. We can now examine this in the limit when k0 using the following limits: {j(ika)(ika)(2+1)!!j(ika)ikaj(ika)η(ika)(2+1)!!(ika)+1η(ika)+1ikaη(ika) Hence, for the combination of the two, we get: j(ika)η(ika)1ika12+1. Giving us: (+1)ika(1ika)12+1ika(1ika)12+1=λik(1ika)12+1 and (2+1)=λa. Hence, when λa=2+1, a bound state appears at E=0! There is a connection between the appearance of a bound state and the divergence of a scattering amplitude as k0. In fact, if we think of the scattering amplitudes as functions of complex k, then bound states appear at the poles of the scattering amplitude, which is an alternate way to solve bound state problems!

Delta shell potential example

For the delta shell potential, we have: f(k)=1kkaλaj2(ka)1ikaλaj(ka)[j(ka)+iη(ka)]. The poles occur at: 1=ikaλaj(ka)[j(ka)+iη(ka)] where we need to substitute kiK and solve for poles. This will give the formula for the bound state energies: 1=Kaλaj(iKa)[j(iKa)+iη(iKa)]. The general rule is that a positive scattering length implies a weakly bound state and strong scattering near k0 while a negative scattering length implies a pre-bound state and strong scattering near k0.

Experimentally tuning Feshbach resonances

In atomic physics, one sweeps the magnetic field across the resonance and form bound state molecules (weakly bound), which can then be studied or made into more deeply bound objects.

We can show this condition holds by verifying the Wronskian: jηηj=1z2

Proof. Begin with the equations z2d2dz2η+2zddzη+(z2(+1))η=0z2d2dz2j+2zddzj+(z2(+1))j=0. Now multiply the first equation by j and the second equation by η, subtracting the results to get: z2[jηηj]+2z[jηηj]=0 z2ddz[jηηj]+2z[jηηj]=0 2zdz=dln[jηηj] 2lnz+c=ln[jηηj] which implies: cz2=jηηj. Checking the limit as z0, gives C=1, so: jηηj=1z2 or: 1(ka)2=λkj(ika)[j(ika)+iη(ika)]. 1=λakaj(ika)[j(ika)+iη(ika)]. Take kiκ in the scattering amplitude to find the same equation for the bound state condition. ◻